| Key Indicators | Metrics | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile | 2.1.1: Enrolment percentage | View document |
| 2.1.2: Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (exclusive of supernumerary seats). | View document | |
| 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity | 2.2.1: The institution recognises multiple intelligences of students and creates policies and programs for all kinds of learners. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes /policies for different levels of learners. | View document |
| 2.2.2: Student- Full time teacher ratio Data requirement: Total number of Students enrolled in the Institution. Total number of full time teachers in the Institution. | View document | |
| 2.3 Teaching-Learning Process | 2.3.1: Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning, peer learning, team teaching, case law method and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching learning process. | View document |
| 2.3.2: The institution adopts effective schemes for mentoring students through teacher mentors and student mentors to address academics and student-psychological issues. | View document | |
| 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality | 2.4.1: Percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts. | View document |
| 2.4.2: Percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / LL.D during the last five years. (consider only highest degree for count) | View document | |
| 2.4.3: Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years). | View document | |
| 2.4.4: Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution throughout during the last five years. | View document | |
| 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms | 2.5.1: Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency, mode and innovation along with prevalence of mechanisms to deal with internal exam related grievances which is transparent and time-bound. | View document |
| 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes | 2.6.1: The institution has stated learning outcomes (Program and Course outcomes)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution. | View document |
| 2.6.2: Pass percentage of Students during last five years. | View document |
